Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Zero Tolerance? CYA!

Joe Woe’s latest rant (see “Dangerous Doodles” below) concerning “Zero Intelligence (Tolerance)” policies in the public schools has its heart in the right place, but the arrow of blame is slightly off the mark.

I was familiar with this most recent episode at Payne Junior High in Arizona via James Taranto’s “Zero Tolerance Watch” in the Wall Street Journal Online blog. Unfortunately, these incidents of vanishing common sense occur with such regularity as to warrant an ongoing feature in his column. The Payne Junior High sketch of a “laser pistol of some sort” is only the latest, but certainly not the most egregious.

As Taranto quipped “Somebody must have told the School Board that ‘drawing a gun’ was dangerous. School Boards have correctly identified a “danger”, but their remaining common sense assures them it’s not a danger to the students in their charge, but rather a danger to their budgets, their legal bills and the thing that they value highest: their careers.

This is the appalling legacy of Columbine – an educational system so frightened of litigation that it negatively affects every aspect of its core mission of teaching students.

With every new (and it must be pointed out – rare) horrendous incident of violence at a school, I have no doubt of the sincere heartbreak and agony felt by administrators and teachers for the victims, as they wring their hands and beseech “what could we have done to prevent this?” – followed immediately by a paralyzing fear of crucifixion in the courts of law and public opinion.

I have some first–hand experience in the administration and governance of schools – albeit, private schools. I can assure you that the burden of legal protection from real or perceived faults of the teachers and administrators weighs heavily on most decisions that must be taken. At our modest private elementary school, located in the sleepy burg of Topeka Kansas, we had parents who wanted eight–foot tall chain link fences and armed guards at the door and other parents who wanted no security whatsoever (That wasn’t the kind of school they wanted THEIR children to attend). The governing board had to attempt to square this intractable circle. Our little school had only a couple of administrators and less than twenty teachers – but we had a dedicated legal counsel.

No, the fault here is not lily–livered dolts running our schools, but rather the litigious “gotta blame and sue somebody” mentality that has taken hold of our modern culture. I accuse the ambulance–chasing trial lawyers (like John Edwards) with their TV ads encouraging every jamoke with a pain or a grievance to sue their perceived enemies into oblivion. I accuse popular movies like “Erin Brockovich” which glamorize these tort–bar–bastards as selfless heroes. And I particularly accuse the otherwise upstanding Americans who decide to assuage their pain and loss by suing the pants off somebody.

In the mean time every school board is advised by their legal counsel to institute “zero tolerance” and other nonsensical schemes, not to protect the children, but to protect their own wary behinds.

2 comments:

Joe Woe said...

Monsieur Riot,

I hope you don't mind me using the French form of address... I mean no disrespect I assure you...

Anyway, though you may be right about the source of zero tolerance policies, my experience is that educators are hardly bristling with contempt for these policies as something hated forced upon them against their protestations by the lawyers. If so, they are doing a good job of hiding it. No, I think that they too, for the most part, embrace the notion. The teacher that turned in the boy for the gun probably did so not from fear of failure to follow school policies but from a misguided agreement with the lunacy.

Joe Woe said...

I guess I'm not done with this one yet... I reassert my original assertion.

Despite your placing the blame on a culture of litigiousness with "sudden-acceleration" syndrome (not that I don't), I still accuse educators of abandoning common sense and I command the spirits of the Interweb to do so.

First off, I have not heard anything that indicates that this is not an isolated occurrence for this particular kid -- that he has a history of threatening behavior. True, I am making the assumption that the news media has made public the relevant facts, and trusting the media is always unwise. There is also the privacy issue. Secondly, I also assume that his teacher saw this doodle in private -- that is, she saw it while grading her student's work and that it had not leaked out to other school personnel first. Teachers have enough papers to grade, they are hardly apt to go through other teacher's work.

And so I now say this: The teacher, upon seeing the doodle had many ways in which she (or he?) could react. One would be to ignore it -- as I am sure that countless teachers of bygone years have before. Another would be to level-headedly realize that the doodle might be in conflict with the school's litigious zero-tolerance policy and to find a way to eliminate the doodle -- "wite-out", magic marker, cutting it out, etc. But these are not what happened. Instead, the teacher turned the paper over to administrators and, as I understand it, claimed she felt threatened. I cannot blame litigiousness for this idiotic behavior. Or, maybe it wasn't idiotic... Perhaps she had it in for the kid. Either way, she makes my Teacher's Hall of Shame.